NIMBYISM :- Understanding the Not In My Backyard Phenomenon
NIMBY, an acronym for “Not In My Backyard,” encapsulates a complex socio-political phenomenon that permeates various aspects of society, from urban planning to environmental activism. This term, coined in the late 20th century, describes the opposition of residents to the introduction of new developments or initiatives in their vicinity, despite recognising the need for such initiatives on a broader scale. NIMBYISM reflects a tension between individual interests and the collective good, posing significant challenges to policymakers and planners worldwide.
Origins and Evolution
The origins of NIMBYISM can be traced back to the 1950s and 1960s in the United States, during the post-war era of suburbanisation and urban renewal projects. As cities expanded, residents became increasingly vocal in opposing developments that they perceived as detrimental to their quality of life. These could range from infrastructure projects like highways and airports to social services facilities and industrial plants.
Michael Gove confirms “No-fault evictions will be "outlawed".
This morning, Housing Secretary Michael Gove told Laura Kuenssberg of the BBC that ‘No Fault Evictions’ will be banned by the next general election.
It’s difficult to watch this play out in a “Ground Hog” kind of way because since the announcement was made in 2019 that Section 21 (Form 6A) notice would be abolished, nothing much has really changed.
Of course, the Renters Reform Bill which will serve as the vehicle to abolish the Section 21 notice, is currently at the Report Stage, but the government has clearly stated that a ban of the notice cannot be enacted until the court system is improved, something confirmed by Michael Gove last year.
When asked by Laura Kuenssberg if he could guarantee that ‘unlawful evictions’ would end by the time of the next general election, Mr Gove responded that: "We will have outlawed it and we will have put the money into the courts in order to ensure that they can enforce that." A woolly response that is most definitely not possible because reforming the courts will not be a quick fix.